33 / 324
14
es
JOURNÉES LYONNAISES DE CHIRURGIE DU GENOU
32
RÉFÉRENCES
[1] ARGENSON JN, PARRATTE S, BERTANI A,
FLECHER X, AUBANIAC JM. Long-term results with a
lateral unicondylar replacement.
Clin Orthop Relat Res
2008; 466(11): 2686.
[2] ASHRAF T, NEWMAN JH, EVANS RL, ACKROYD
CE. Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement survivor-
ship and clinical experience over 21 years.
J Bone Joint
Surg Br 2002; 84(8): 1126.
[3] INSALL JN, DORR LD, SCOTT RD, SCOTT WN.
Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.
Clin
Orthop Relat Res 1989; (248): 13.
[4] KERKHOFFS GM, RADEMAKERS MV, ALTENAM,
MARTI RK. Combined intra-articular and varus opening
wedge osteotomy for lateral depression and valgus malu-
nion of the proximal part of the tibia.
J Bone Joint Surg Am.
2008; 90: 1252-7.
[5] LUSTIG S, PAILLOT JL, SERVIEN E, HENRY J, AIT SI
SELMI T, NEYRET P. Cemented all polyethylene tibial insert
unicompartimental knee arthroplasty: a long term follow-up
study.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Feb; 95(1): 12-21.
[6] OHDERA T, TOKUNAGA J, KOBAYASHI A.
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for lateral gonarthro-
sis: midterm results.
J Arthroplasty 2001; 16(2): 196.
[7] PENNINGTON DW, SWIENCKOWSKI JJ, LUTES
WB, DRAKE GN. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthro-
plasty: survivorship and technical considerations at an
average follow-up of 12.4 years.
J Arthroplasty 2006;
21(1): 13.
[8] RASMUSSEN PS. Tibial condylar fractures as a cause of
degenerative arthritis.
Acta Orthop Scand. 1972; 43: 566-75.
[9] SAENZ CL, McGRATH MS, MARKER DR, SEYLER
TM, MONT MA, BONUTTI PM. Early failure of a uni-
compartmental knee arthroplasty design with an all-poly-
ethylene tibial component.
Knee 17(1): 53.
[10] SAH AP, SCOTT RD. Lateral unicompartmental knee
arthroplasty through a medial approach. Study with an ave-
rage five-year follow-up.
J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;
89(9): 1948.
[11] SERVIEN E, AITSISELMI T, NEYRET P, VERDONK
P. How to select candidates for lateral unicompartmental
prosthesis.
Current Orthopaedic Practice 2008; 19(4): 451-8.
[12] WEISS NG, PARVIZI J, TROUSDALE RT, BRYCE
RD, LEWALLEN DG. Total knee arthroplasty in patients
with a prior fracture of the tibial plateau.
J Bone Joint Surg
Am. 2003 Feb; 85-A(2): 218-21.
CONCLUSION
Nos résultats à moyen terme sont donc encoura-
geants. La prothèse unicompartimentale est une
option intéressante en cas de séquelles de fractu-
re du plateau tibial externe avec cal vicieux intra
articulaire. Utiliser des vis ou une plaque pour
renforcer l’os sous-chondral permet d’obtenir
une bonne fixation de l’implant tibial, même
dans les cas avec enfoncement majeur.