80 / 324
CHANGES IN LENGTH AFTER TKA: ACCURACY OF A PREDICTIVE METHOD
79
REFERENCES
[1] HERNIGOU P, JAAFARA, HAMDADOUA. Leg leng-
th changes after upper tibial osteotomy: analysis of different
preoperative planning methods.
Rev Chir Orthop
Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2002; 88: 68-73.
[2] KESSLER AC, PUGH LI, STASIKELIS PJ Length
changes in tibial osteotomy with angular correction.
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2005; 14: 337-9.
[3] PEARLE AD, GOLESKI P, MUSAHL V, KENDOFF D
Reliability of image-free navigation to monitor lower-limb
alignment.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91 Suppl 1: 90-4.
[4] HENDERSON RC, KEMP GJ. Assessment of the
mechanical axis in adolescent tibia vara.
Orthopedics. 1991;
14: 313-6.
[5] HENDERSON RC, KEMP GJ J
R
, GREENE WB.
Adolescent tibia vara: alternatives for operative treatment.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74: 342-50.
[6] COOKE TD, SLED EA, SCUDAMORE RA. Frontal
plane knee alignment: a call for standardized measurement.
J Rheumatol. 2007; 34: 1796-801.
[7] HUNGERFORD DS. The consequences of malalignment:
forewarned is forearmed.
Orthopedics. 2000; 23: 981-2.
[8] OBERST M, BERTSCH C, WURSTLIN S, HOLZ U
CT analysis of leg alignment after conventional vs. naviga-
ted knee prosthesis implantation. Initial results of a control-
led, prospective and randomized study.
Unfallchirurg.
2003; 106: 941-8.
[9] HUNGERFORD DS, HUNGERFORD MWWhy knees
fail.
Orthopedics. 2004; 27: 993-4.
[10] HUNGERFORD DS. Measured resection: a valuable
tool in TKA.
Orthopedics. 2008; 31: 941-2.
[11] MARTIN JW, WHITESIDE LA. The influence of joint
line position on knee stability after condylar knee arthro-
plasty.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990: 146-56.
[12] BERTSCH C, HOLZ U, KONRAD G, VAKILI A,
OBERST M. Early clinical outcome after navigated total
knee arthroplasty. Comparison with conventional implanta-
tion in TKA: a controlled and prospective analysis.
Orthopade. 2007; 36: 739-45.
[13] OBERST M. Investigation of the accuracy of various
techniques for measuring the epicondylar axis.
Orthopade.
2007; 36: 165-6; author reply 66.