Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  327 / 460 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 327 / 460 Next Page
Page Background

P. Beaufils, M. Thaunat, D. Passeron, P. Boisrenoult, N Pujol

326

Fig. 5:

a) Example of external rotation by the lateral approach (The ATT is even medialized in relation to the center

of the keel).

b) And internal rotation by the medial approach.

a

b

Literature

[1] Abadie P, Galaud B, Michaut M, Fallet L,

Boisrenoult P, Beaufils P. Distal femur rotational

alignment and patellar subluxation: a CT scan in vivo

assessment.

Orthop Traum : Surg Res 2009 ;95: 267-71.

[2] Ammari T, Zniber B, Boisrenoult P,

Charrois O, Perreau M and Beaufils P. Patellar

position and lateral approach for total knee arthroplasty in

degenerative knees with lateral femoropatellar arthrosis.

Rev

Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2005; 91: 215-21.

[3] Arnold MP, Friederich NF, Widmer H,

Muller W. Patellar substitution in total knee prosthesis,

important?

Orthopäde, 1998, 27, 637-41.

[4] Barrack RL, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW. Patellar

resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective

randomised double blind study with five to seven years of

follow-up.

J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2001, 83, 1376-81.

[5] Beaufils P, Abouchaya A. Les reprises pour

l’appareil extenseur. In: Les reprises de prothèses totales de

genou. Symposium sous la direction de P. Burdin et D. Huten

(Réunion annuelle de la SOFCOT 2000).

Rev Chir Orthop,

2001, 87 (suppl au n° 5), 151-6.

[6] Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash

HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after

total knee arthroplasty.

Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 356:

144-53.

[7] Berry DJ, Rand JA. Isolated patellar component

revision of total knee arthroplasty.

Clin Orthop, 1993, 286,

110-5.

[8] Bindelglass DF, Vince KG. Patellar tilt and

subluxation following subvastus and parapatellar approach

in total knee arthroplasty. Implication for surgical technique.

J Arthroplasty, 1996, 11, 507-11.

[9] Boyd AD, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, Poss R,

Sledge CB. Long term complications after total knee

arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the patella.

J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1993, 75, 761-81.

[10]

B

rick

GW, S

cott

RD. The patellofemoral component

of total knee arthroplasty.

Clin Orthop, 1988, 231, 163-78.

[11] Burki H, Von Knoch M, Heiss C, Drobny T,

Munzinger U. Lateral approach with osteotomy of the

tibial tubercle in primary total knee arthroplasty.

Clin

Orthop, 1999, 362, 156-61.

[12] Chan KC, Gill GS. Postoperative patellar tilt in total

knee arthroplasty.

J Arthroplast, 1999, 14, 300-4.

[13] Chang CH, Chen KH, Yang RS, Liu TK, Muscle

torques in total knee arthroplasty with subvastus and

parapatellar approaches.

Clin Orthop, 2002, 398, 189-95.

[14] CilaE, GuzelV, OzalayM, Ran J, Simsek SA,

Kanath U. Ozturk, Subvastus versus medial parapatellar

approach in total knee arthroplasty.

Arch Trauma Surg 265-

8002, 122.

[15] Doolittle KH, Turner RH. Patellofemoral

problems following total knee arthroplasty.

Orthop Rev,

1988, 17, 696-702.

[16] Engh GA, Holt BT, Parks NL. A midvastus

muscle-splitting approach for total knee arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty 1997, 12 : 322.

[17] Faure BT, Benjamin JB, Lindsey B, Volz RG,

Schutte D. Comparison of the subvastus and paramédian

surgical approaches in bilateral knee arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty 1993, 8, 511-6.

[18] Firestone TP, Teeny SM, Krackow KA. The

clinical and roentgenographic results of cementless porous-

coated patellar fixation.

Clin Orthop, 1991, 273, 184-9.