Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  250 / 324 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 250 / 324 Next Page
Page Background

INTRODUCTION

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is undoubtedly

one of the most successful orthopaedic opera-

tions of the end of the last century [1, 2].

Although it has a high success rate, patient dis-

satisfaction linked to functional impairments

remains substantial. This rate has been reported

up to 20% [3, 4] and even to 37% in the Ayers

and Franklin study who reviewed hundreds of

TKA [5]. Function limitations are usually asso-

ciated with pain, instability, reduced range of

motion and lower quality of life. These limita-

tions become more noticeable on young and

demanding patients. The number of knee

replacements is increasing and fifty percent of

TKA will be less than 65 years old in the next

following years namely in the USA and will

then amplify the above stated figure [6].

Many authors have shown that poor outcome

of total knee arthroplasty depends upon a num-

ber of factors including knee prosthetic geom-

etry, preoperative clinical condition, knee

range of movement, surgical technique, reha-

bilitation protocol and proper knee kinematics

restoration [7]. One of the most common rec-

ognized factors of functional discontent is

abnormal knee kinematics. The aetiology of

abnormal knee kinematics is likely multifacto-

rial. Post operative knee kinematics have been

extensively studied using several methods such

as fluoroscopy, RSA and three D gait analysis

in the view of identifying factors responsible

for unsatisfactory functional outcome [8].

After TKA, functional outcomes are decipher-

able using gait clinical assessment. Studies shed

light on post operative knee joint replacement

kinematics abnormalities such as atypical axial

rotation, altered center of joint rotation changes

in the knee adduction moment, walking speed,

cadence, and symmetry [9]. Gait analysis stud-

ies using new technology identified features

demonstrating subtle functional variation after

TKA. McClelland showed that extension

moment and adduction moment have been help-

ful in predicting early failure and TKA

malalignment [10]. RSA readings after TKA

have demonstrated that higher peak flexion

moment in patients is at risk of early tibial com-

ponent loosening [11]. Andriacchi explained

that a patient with a painful knee reduces stride

length and the moment arms of the prosthetic

knee in walking more slowly. The same author

emphasized that biphasic moment pattern is a

consistent finding in normal subject, which is

never the case after TKA [12].

249

ANALYSE À LAMARCHE DE DEUX SÉRIES

HOMOGÈNES DE 40 PATIENTS OPÉRÉS

DE PROTHÈSES TOTALES DE GENOU

NAVIGUÉES ET NON NAVIGUÉES

Gait analysis: a comparative study of two homogenous

groups of 40 navigated and conventional TKA.

F. PICARD, J. DILLON, J. CLARKE, A. GREGORI, A. KINNINMONTH