Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  67 / 324 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 67 / 324 Next Page
Page Background

14

es

JOURNÉES LYONNAISES DE CHIRURGIE DU GENOU

66

[16] MORGAN SS, BONSHAHI A, PRADHAN N

et al.

2008. The influence of postoperative coronal alignment on

revision surgery in total knee arthroplasty.

Int Orthop 32:

639-42.

[17] PITTO RP, GRAYDON AJ, BRADLEY L

et al.

2006.

Accuracy of a computer-assisted navigation system for total

knee replacement.

J Bone Joint Surg Br 88: 601-5.

[18] RITTER MA, FARIS PM, KEATING EM

et al.

1994.

Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect

on survival.

Clin Orthop Relat Res: 153-6.

[19] SAMPATH SA, VOON SH, SANGSTER M

et al.

2009. The statistical relationship between varus deformity,

surgeon’s experience, BMI and tourniquet time for compu-

ter assisted total knee replacements.

Knee 16: 121-4.

[20] SIU D, COOKE TD, BROEKHOVEN LD

et al.

1991. A

standardized technique for lower limb radiography. Practice,

applications, and error analysis.

Invest Radiol 26: 71-7.

[21] TJORNSTRAND BA, EGUND N, HAGSTEDT BV

1981. High tibial osteotomy: a seven-year clinical and

radiographic follow-up.

Clin Orthop Relat Res: 124-36.

[22] YAFFE MA, KOO SS, STULBERG SD 2008.

Radiographic and navigation measurements of TKA limb ali-

gnment do not correlate.

Clin Orthop Relat Res 466: 2736-44.

[23] YAU WP, LEUNG A, LIU KG

et al.

2007.

Interobserver and intra-observer errors in obtaining visually

selected anatomical landmarks during registration process

in non-image-based navigation-assisted total knee arthro-

plasty.

J Arthroplasty 22: 1150-61.