LIVRE JDG 2008

- préférer cette option en cas de patient pré-

sentant des comorbidités contre-indiquant

une intervention lourde.

Dans un futur proche, la navigation pourrait

être une aide précieuse d’une part pour amé-

liorer le positionnement des PUnis de pre-

mière intention en évitant toute hypercorrec-

tion, celle-ci pouvant survenir non seulement

en extension, mais aussi en flexion.

JOURNÉES LYONNAISES DE CHIRURGIE DU GENOU

278

BIBLIOGRAPHIE

[1] MARMOR L. 1988. Unicompartmental arthroplasty of

the knee with a minimum ten-year follow-up period.

Clin

Orthop. 228: 171-177.

[2] CARTIER P., CHAIB S., VANVOOREN P. 1987.

Unicompartmental prosthetic replacement of the knee.

Apropos of 159 cases- a maximum follow-up period of 10

years.

Rev. Chir Orthop. 73: 130-133.

[3] BERGER R., MENEGHINI M., JACOBS J.

et al.

2005.

Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at mini-

mum of ten years of follow-up.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 87:

999-1006.

[4] ROBERTSON O., BORGQUIST L., KNUTSON K.

et al.

1999. Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompart-

mental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis is a

cost-effective alternative. 15,437 primary tricompartmen-

tal prostheses were compared with 10,624 primary

medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses.

Acta

Orthop Scand. 70:170-5.

[5] SLOVER J., ESPEHAUG B., HAVELIN L.

et al.

2006.

Cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental and total knee

arthroplasty in elderly, low-demand patients. A Markov

decision analysis.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 88: 2348-2355.

[6] SERVIEN E., TARIK A., NEYRET PH

et al.

2007. How

to Select Candidates for Lateral Unicompartmental

Prosthesis.

Tech Knee Surg. 6:51-59.

[7] BÖHM I., LANDSIEDL F. 2000. Revision surgery after

failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 35

cases.

J Arthroplasty 15: 982-989.

[8] CHATAIN F., RICHARD A., DESCHAMPS G. 2004.

Revision total knee arthroplasty after unicompartmental

femorotibial prosthesis: 54 cases.

Rev Chir Orthop. 9: 49-57.

[9] BANKS S., FREGLY B., BONIFORTI F.

et al.

2005.

Comparing

in vivo

kinematics of unicondylar and bi-uni-

condylar, KSSTA 13: 551-556.

[10] NEYRET P., DAHER A. 2007. Prothèse unicomparti-

mentale. In: Neyret P., Verdonk P., Tarik S. eds. Chirurgie

du genou: “my knee practice”.

Paris: Masson 153-162.

[11] DESCHAMPS G., CARTIER P. 1998. Echecs et moda-

lités de reprises des prosthèses unicompartimentales. In:

Cartier P., Epinette J., Deschamps G., Hernigou P. eds.

Prothèses unicompartimentales du genou.

Paris: Exp.

Scien Fr, 65: 161-64.

[12] ROBERTSON O. 2006. The Swedish Knee

Arthroplasty Register – The present situation. In: La pro-

thèse du genou.

Montpellier: Sauramps medical; 171-174.

[13] LEWOLD S., ROBERTSSON O. 1998. Revision of

unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1135

cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study.

Acta

Orthop Scand 69: 469-474.