Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  179 / 324 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 179 / 324 Next Page
Page Background

14

es

JOURNÉES LYONNAISES DE CHIRURGIE DU GENOU

178

[20] SCHAI PA, SUH JT, THORNHILL TS, SCOTT RD

(1998) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in middle-aged

patients: a 2- to 6-year follow-up evaluation.

J Arthroplasty

13: 365-72.

[21] SERVIEN E, NEYRET P, AITSISELMI T, VERDONK

P (2007) How to select candidates for lateral unicompart-

mental prosthesis.

Techn in Knee Surg 6: 51-9.

[22] SISTON RA, GOODMAN SB, PATEL JJ, DELP SL,

GIORI NJ (2006) The high variability of tibial rotational ali-

gnment in total knee arthroplasty.

Clin Orthop 452: 65-9.

[23] UEHARA K, KADOYAY, KOBAYASHI A, OHASHI

H, YAMANO Y (2002) Bone anatomy and rotational align-

ment in total knee arthroplasty.

Clin Orthop 402: 196-201.

[24] WEALE AE, MURRAY DW, BAINES J, NEWMAN

JH (2000) Radiological changes five years after unicom-

partmental knee replacement.

J Bone Joint Surg 82B: 996-

1000.

[25] WHITESIDE LA, AMADOR DD (1988) The effect of

posterior tibial slope on knee stability after Ortholoc total

knee arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty 3: S51-7.

[26] YOSHIOKAY, SIU D, COOKE TD (1987) The anato-

my and functional axes of the femur.

J Bone Joint Surg 69A:

873-80.

[27] YOSHIOKAY, SIU DW, SCUDAMORE RA, COOKE

TD (1989) Tibial anatomy and functional axes.

J Orthop

Res. 7: 132-7.