LIVRE JDG 2010

JOURNÉES LYONNAISES DE CHIRURGIE DU GENOU

100

[10] EWALD FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty

roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system.

Clin

Orthop Relat Res, (248): 9, 1989.

[11] FONT-RODRIGUEZ DE, SCUDERI GR, INSALL JN.

Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty.

Clin

Orthop Relat Res, 345: 79, 1997.

[12] GAO F, HENRICSON A, NILSSON KG. Cemented

versus uncemented fixation of the femoral component of the

NexGen CR total knee replacement in patients younger than

60 years: a prospective randomised controlled RSA study.

Knee, 16(3): 200, 2009.

[13] GILL GS, JOSHI AB. Long-term results of Kinematic

Condylar knee replacement. An analysis of 404 knees.

J Bone Joint Surg Br, 83(3): 355, 2001.

[14] HARTFORD JM, HUNT T, KAUFER H. Low contact

stress mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty: results at 5 to

13 years.

J Arthroplasty, 16-8: 977, 2001.

[15] HOFMANN AA, EVANICH JD, FERGUSON RP,

CAMARGO MP. Ten- to 14-year clinical follow-up of the

cementless Natural Knee system.

Clin Orthop Relat Res,

388: 85, 2001.

[16] HUDDLESTON JI, WILEY JW, SCOTT RD. Zone 4

femoral radiolucent lines in hybrid versus cemented total

knee arthroplasties: are they clinically significant?

Clin

Orthop Relat Res, 441: 334, 2005.

[17] ILLGEN R, TUETING J, ENRIGHT T,

SCHREIBMAN K, MCBEATH A, HEINER J. Hybrid total

knee arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of clinical and

radiographic outcomes at average 10 years follow-up.

J Arthroplasty, 19(7 Suppl 2): 95, 2004.

[18] INSALL JN, DORR LD, SCOTT RD, SCOTT WN.

Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Clin

Orthop Relat Res, 248: 13, 1989.

[19] INSALL JN, RANAWAT CS, SCOTT WN, WALKER

P. Total condylar knee replacement: preliminary report.

Clin

Orthop Relat Res, 120: 149, 1976.

[20] LASKIN RS The Genesis total knee prosthesis: a 10-

year follow-up study.

Clin Orthop Relat Res, 388: 95, 2001.

[21] LIU TK, YANG RS, CHIENG PU, SHEE BW.

Periprosthetic bone mineral density of the distal femur after

total knee arthroplasty.

Int Orthop, 19(6): 346, 1995.

[22] NILSSON KG, KARRHOLM J, LINDER L. Femoral

component migration in total knee arthroplasty: randomized

study comparing cemented and uncemented fixation of the

Miller-Galante I design.

J Orthop Res, 13(3): 347, 1995.

[23] PARKER DA, RORABECK CH, BOURNE RB. Long-

term followup of cementless versus hybrid fixation for total

knee arthroplasty.

Clin Orthop Relat Res, 388: 68, 2001.

[24] PETERS PC, ENGH GA, DWYER KA, VINH TN

Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty without cement.

J Bone Joint Surg Am, 74(6): 864, 1992.

[25] PETERSEN MM, NIELSEN PT, LAURITZEN JB,

LUND B. Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal

tibia after uncemented total knee arthroplasty. A 3-year fol-

low-up of 25 knees

. Acta Orthop Scand, 66(6): 513, 1995.

[26] RORABECK CH. Total knee replacement: should it be

cemented or hybrid?

Can J Surg, 42(1): 21, 1999.

[27] UVEHAMMER J, KARRHOLM J, CARLSSON L.

Cemented versus hydroxyapatite fixation of the femoral

component of the Freeman-Samuelson total knee replace-

ment: a radiostereometric analysis.

J Bone Joint Surg Br,

89(1): 39, 2007.

[28] VAN RIETBERGEN B, HUISKES R, WEINANS H,

SUMNER DR, TURNER TM, GALANTE JO. ESB

Research Award 1992. The mechanism of bone remodeling

and resorption around press-fitted THA stems.

J Biomech,

26(4-5): 369, 1993.

[29] WATANABE H, AKIZUKI S, TAKIZAWA T. Survival

analysis of a cementless, cruciate-retaining total knee

arthroplasty. Clinical and radiographic assessment 10 to 13

years after surgery.

J Bone Joint Surg Br, 86-6: 824, 2004.